Recent Amendments to the Club's Governing Documents

 Since 2019, there have been five Owner ballots relating to the governance of the Club. All ballots required a 2/3 supermajority and all were approved by the Owners:

Goodwin Purchase:      Approved with 74.1% of the vote (341 of 460 votes)

Builder Programs:        Approved with 86.1% of the vote (348 of 404 votes)

Membership Model:     Approved with 89.3% of the vote (377 of 422 votes)

Entity Accountability:  Approved with 93.2% of the vote (327 of 351 votes)

Amenities:                    Approved with 68.9% of the vote (335 of 486 votes)

In every vote, the ballots were sent to the Owners and the vote was mentioned in the daily email blast--at least until the Board believed that the Owners had voted the "right" way. For instance, the ballot for the Amenities closed on March 26, 2021, but the daily email blast stopped reminding people to vote about a week before the voting closed. My view is that everyone should be reminded to vote, but no one should be subject to pressure to vote one way or the other. Needless to say, my view is not the view held by the Board. There was also at least one instance where an Owner was accosted by a member of the Amenities Committee about failing to support the Amenities vote. Seriously?

The Goodwin Purchase and Amenities votes were subject to a major reach out by the Club. Meetings were conducted, the Board received periodic reports of the status of the vote (including lists of Owners who had not yet voted), and Board and Committee members reached out to Owners who had not yet voted to induce them to vote in favor of the proposal (particularly to Owners who the Club believed were apt to support the initiative being voted upon).

Meetings were held explaining the Builder Programs and Alternative Membership ballots, but the Board did not have an organized program of reaching out the Owners (although in each case, the vote was relatively uncontroversial and there was strong support from the Owners). No marketing was done for the Entity Accountability vote (which was a technical vote to ensure that the Club was able to require entities (e.g., LLCs) that bought lots to be financially responsible) other than sending out the ballots and mentioning the vote in the daily email blast.

All five proposals were approved by the Owners, although the Amenities proposal was dragged across the finish line by the Board. I note that a quorum of about 185 Owners is required for a valid vote--even the ballots with no sales job easily reached the quorum.

I provide this information simply for background for future Owner votes.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Seawall Settlement: Promises made--promises kept?

As noted in two recent posts ( here  and  here ), there are a number of issues involved in the seawall settlement known only by the Board and the 12 Owners who have sued the Club. A video exists of Keith Wandell making an unequivocal promise to submit any settlement relating to the seawall to the Owners for a vote. Fortunately, the By-Laws empower the Board President to call a special meeting of the Owners--with or without the concurrence of the Board. Here are some things to ponder: -     No details on the settlement have been made available to the Owners. -     The Owners are already on the hook for the 1/3 of the J-Lot seawall owned by the Club. The settlement will deal with how much of the remaining 2/3 of the costs are paid by the Club. -       There are three types of costs involved: (1) past maintenance and repair costs; (2) the reserve for future maintenance and repair costs that should be established; and (3) future...
Read more

No excuses. A correction and an apology.

When I arrived at the United States Naval Academy on June 30, 1969, I was told that you can make it through life with five "basic responses": (1) yes, sir; (2) no, sir; (3) aye aye, sir; (4) I'll find out, sir; and (5) no excuse, sir. Fifty three years later I need to revert to my basic responses. On Saturday night, I published a post stating that the Board's statement at the annual meeting that the Third Quarter Financial Results had been published was a "lie." In fact, the Third Quarter Financial Results had been published, but were mis-labeled. In any event, an administrative error is not a "lie." I was wrong to refer to the administrative error in posting the Third Quarter Financials as a "lie" and wrong to use a sarcastic post to do so, and I have no excuse for making that post. I unreservedly apologize for the post. It was premature and unfair and I very much regret publishing it. I have deleted the post, but this post will remain o...
Read more

The Board Announces New Assessments

On Monday, November 29, the Colleton River Club Board announced increases in assessments and fees for both the Owners and Invitational Program ("IP") participants. For 2022, the annual assessments will be: Full Members:                  $23,565 Lifestyle Members:          $15,874 IP (Local):                        $18,000                   IP (National):                   $14,625 The assessments for Full and Lifestyle Members do not include the $20,000 assessment approved for the amenities in March 2021. Owners who elected to pay the special assessment under the five-year installment plan will pay an annual assessment of $28,015 (Full) or $20,324 (Lifestyle). Please recall that IP participants do not pay special assessments. Here are some fun facts: Full Dues (2017): ...
Read more